Britons have placed Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials in eighth place in a vote for “books you can’t live without.” Pride and Prejudice took top place, but Pullman is one of few contemporary authors in the top 20; the only other in the top 10 is J.K.Rowling. The Bible came in at 6th, two places above the anti-organised-religion message of His Dark Materials. Read more.
Could you live without His Dark Materials?
February 28, 2007
This entry was posted in The Book Trilogy. Bookmark the permalink.
I can live without food as much as I can live with out HDM. :laughing:
"All these top 10 books have a timeless quality, whenever they were written." – Sue Horner, QCA
i like that.
organised-religion message?
please.
Jimi: Do you not read HDM as saying organised religion is 'bad'?
his dark materials and harry potter deserves to be top 2 positions
hey…i've read 4 of those books plus some of the Bible. yeah, that's right, i DO feel special.
and no, i simply cannot live without HDM.
… Harry Potter? Higher than HDM?
Bloody fanboy/fangirls. They clearly haven't read HDM.
Actually, I would place His Dark Materials along with The Lord of the Rings for first.
I have to agree with Jimi and say that the books are far too complicated to sum them up simply as having an anti-organized religion message. Pullman is an athetist, but he has described himself as a "Christian atheist" and is very grateful for the memories and influences he has from growing up in the Church. He deeply disagrees with many common Christian teachings, but I have yet to find a quote by him saying that organized religion is the bane of the world (that's author Daniel Quinn's expertise).
I think #1 on my list would be a thesaurus : )
Yeah, I've just…never been at all into the HP series. :wassat: They're far too childish.
interesting to note that 3 out of the top 4 were recent movies…
witch-girl: I don't think it's right to call any book too childish. Harry Potter has many important universal themes that any age can relate to. Although it is okay not to like the books, to call it childish is truly degrading.
And as far as the list goes, HDM definitely should have been closer to the top. But then again it is tied with 1984, a classic in its own right (as much as I hate the book).
In fact, phantom, Jane Eyre was recently produced as a TV series in the UK (where the poll was taken) too!
I don't know that childish as an attribute has to be degrading… but the prose is written in a very, um, youthful style, however adult the themes. And lots of children's stories contain important universal themes that any age can relate to; they are still best suited to and/or aimed at children.
I read those books 8 years ago, if I still loving them, that should answer your question
HDM in my personal top is in the 1th Place! of course.
and i cant believe HP got a higher place than HDM
come on
Well, yeah, Jammer, I definitely see what you mean–you're perfectly right about how HP does, in fact, tackle a lot of very important themes for all ages. I understand that well. It's just that…well, I don't know: maybe what I really wanted to say back there was just that the HP series isn't all that I normally look for in books that I "can't live without". 😉 Do you see what I mean? I wish I were more articulate. I can almost never word myself exactly the way I want to…
mr Anderson is a moron. the only reason they like HP because they made movies. I bet half of them didn't even read the book. Sheesh
mmm …
Hear, hear Reedie_Belaqua!!!
Call me a moron then strengthen my point with yours? Interesting.
Please refrain from personal insults here. Sweeping generalisations are fine.
I agree with putting many of these on the list, they all have a righful place except for LOTR which i found tedious, boring and overcomplicated… HDM is the number one i couldn't live without, i'd put HP in the top 10 too because it's easy to read, 1984 is my seond favourite of all times after HDM and Jane Eyre and to Kill a Mockingbird are two of my favourites, also. Yay 🙂
Really, I could live without HDM. Despite the cool name (His Dark Materials.. wish I’d though of it. LOL) its not that great of a book. In all honesty, to the person who said that Harry Potter was too ‘childish’ I don’t know *how* you go through this book. Harry Potter has depth (i.e. based in Alchemy, various mythology, various religions, other literary must reads (Wuthering Heights, ect.) While HDM is simply another ‘little girl must save world’ story. Don’t get me wrong, except for the blantant anti-Christian message in this book I like it, but it is definetly over-hyped.
Lyra is the reason I tend to think of it negativly, in fandom terms, she is very Mary-Sue like. Even her flaws are her good qualities, and too me it is the sign of a weak writer when your characters don’t have realistic flaws.
I wouldn’t even put HDM on that list. Its caused so many problems. Angry remarks and such. I would have to put Stephen King’s The Dark Tower as #1 and Stephen King’s It at #2 then Salem’s Lot at #3. And finally I’d put Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman at #4. Everything else would go down the same, excluding HDM.