Could you live without His Dark Materials?
Posted on by Will

Britons have placed Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials in eighth place in a vote for “books you can’t live without.” Pride and Prejudice took top place, but Pullman is one of few contemporary authors in the top 20; the only other in the top 10 is J.K.Rowling. The Bible came in at 6th, two places above the anti-organised-religion message of His Dark Materials. Read more.

This entry was posted in The Book Trilogy. Bookmark the permalink.




24 Responses to Could you live without His Dark Materials?

  1. The Serpent says:

    I can live without food as much as I can live with out HDM. :laughing:

  2. jesssia says:

    "All these top 10 books have a timeless quality, whenever they were written." – Sue Horner, QCA

    i like that.

  3. jimi says:

    organised-religion message?

    please.

  4. Willl says:

    Jimi: Do you not read HDM as saying organised religion is 'bad'?

  5. vijay krishna says:

    his dark materials and harry potter deserves to be top 2 positions

  6. Alewyn says:

    hey…i've read 4 of those books plus some of the Bible. yeah, that's right, i DO feel special.

    and no, i simply cannot live without HDM.

  7. Mr Anderson says:

    … Harry Potter? Higher than HDM?

    Bloody fanboy/fangirls. They clearly haven't read HDM.

  8. Silverfist says:

    Actually, I would place His Dark Materials along with The Lord of the Rings for first.

  9. Libby says:

    I have to agree with Jimi and say that the books are far too complicated to sum them up simply as having an anti-organized religion message. Pullman is an athetist, but he has described himself as a "Christian atheist" and is very grateful for the memories and influences he has from growing up in the Church. He deeply disagrees with many common Christian teachings, but I have yet to find a quote by him saying that organized religion is the bane of the world (that's author Daniel Quinn's expertise).

  10. Kinders Kinley says:

    I think #1 on my list would be a thesaurus : )

  11. Witch-girl says:

    Yeah, I've just…never been at all into the HP series. :wassat: They're far too childish.

  12. phantom says:

    interesting to note that 3 out of the top 4 were recent movies…

  13. Jammer says:

    witch-girl: I don't think it's right to call any book too childish. Harry Potter has many important universal themes that any age can relate to. Although it is okay not to like the books, to call it childish is truly degrading.

    And as far as the list goes, HDM definitely should have been closer to the top. But then again it is tied with 1984, a classic in its own right (as much as I hate the book).

  14. Kinders Kinley says:

    In fact, phantom, Jane Eyre was recently produced as a TV series in the UK (where the poll was taken) too!

    I don't know that childish as an attribute has to be degrading… but the prose is written in a very, um, youthful style, however adult the themes. And lots of children's stories contain important universal themes that any age can relate to; they are still best suited to and/or aimed at children.

  15. kate says:

    I read those books 8 years ago, if I still loving them, that should answer your question

  16. Reedie_Belacqua says:

    HDM in my personal top is in the 1th Place! of course.

    and i cant believe HP got a higher place than HDM

    come on

  17. Witch-girl says:

    Well, yeah, Jammer, I definitely see what you mean–you're perfectly right about how HP does, in fact, tackle a lot of very important themes for all ages. I understand that well. It's just that…well, I don't know: maybe what I really wanted to say back there was just that the HP series isn't all that I normally look for in books that I "can't live without". 😉 Do you see what I mean? I wish I were more articulate. I can almost never word myself exactly the way I want to…

  18. bball_brilliant says:

    mr Anderson is a moron. the only reason they like HP because they made movies. I bet half of them didn't even read the book. Sheesh

  19. silvertongue says:

    mmm …

  20. Silverfist says:

    Hear, hear Reedie_Belaqua!!!

  21. Mr Anderson says:

    Call me a moron then strengthen my point with yours? Interesting.

    Please refrain from personal insults here. Sweeping generalisations are fine.

  22. Annabel says:

    I agree with putting many of these on the list, they all have a righful place except for LOTR which i found tedious, boring and overcomplicated… HDM is the number one i couldn't live without, i'd put HP in the top 10 too because it's easy to read, 1984 is my seond favourite of all times after HDM and Jane Eyre and to Kill a Mockingbird are two of my favourites, also. Yay 🙂

  23. emily says:

    Really, I could live without HDM. Despite the cool name (His Dark Materials.. wish I’d though of it. LOL) its not that great of a book. In all honesty, to the person who said that Harry Potter was too ‘childish’ I don’t know *how* you go through this book. Harry Potter has depth (i.e. based in Alchemy, various mythology, various religions, other literary must reads (Wuthering Heights, ect.) While HDM is simply another ‘little girl must save world’ story. Don’t get me wrong, except for the blantant anti-Christian message in this book I like it, but it is definetly over-hyped.

    Lyra is the reason I tend to think of it negativly, in fandom terms, she is very Mary-Sue like. Even her flaws are her good qualities, and too me it is the sign of a weak writer when your characters don’t have realistic flaws.

  24. rancid_bear_meat says:

    I wouldn’t even put HDM on that list. Its caused so many problems. Angry remarks and such. I would have to put Stephen King’s The Dark Tower as #1 and Stephen King’s It at #2 then Salem’s Lot at #3. And finally I’d put Neil Gaiman’s The Sandman at #4. Everything else would go down the same, excluding HDM.