Movie Images | Promotional Stills | London
Production designer Dennis Gassner's redesign of London. ?ɬ¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?Ö‚ÄúLondon was particularly fun to do because you don't get to redesign London very often! I wanted to do that in an homage to Christopher Wren, who redesigned London [after the Great Fire] but never got to realise it - except for St. Paul's and some churches. I've kind of taken the symbol of St. Paul's as the keystone, and developed around that a more glass world.?ɬ¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?Ǭù
Subscribe to comments
55 Comments
Add a comment:
Subscribe to comments

Content © 2001-2012 BridgeToTheStars.Net.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.
Powered by Zenphoto
L!BBY: on 02/09/2007
...: on 02/15/2007
pineapple: on 02/16/2007
hb: on 02/16/2007
wierd.
Pan_Kirjava_Isabelle: on 02/17/2007
But it still is cool!!
Pan_Kirjava_Isabelle: on 02/17/2007
Sorry!
Saylo: on 02/21/2007
Tessa: on 02/21/2007
Steve_L: on 02/24/2007
laura: on 02/25/2007
Eyborg: on 02/25/2007
But still, interesting...
Alex: on 03/05/2007
Witch_Queen: on 03/10/2007
: on 03/12/2007
Maria: on 03/13/2007
I better like Londons this way it is now!!!
Can wait to the film!!!!!!!!
Gyptian_Queen: on 03/13/2007
Pullman killed Lee and Fred, but I still love him!: on 03/16/2007
I'm SO excited now!!!
Remember, Lyra's world is NOT our world... just thought some of you ought to remember that... ^_^
Fox: on 03/17/2007
Whoa!
Yes, Alex, looks like steampunk all right! :D
P.S. Lyra?Ǭ¥s world is not "behind" ours, its "parallel", as "different" from ours. I am willing to believe it may look like this. :)
Lyra_B_S: on 03/17/2007
John Parry: on 03/18/2007
Thor: on 03/19/2007
Thor: on 03/25/2007
Senza: on 03/28/2007
Marisa Coulter: on 03/29/2007
Pan_Kirjava_Isabelle: on 04/03/2007
Anna: on 04/12/2007
Pan_Kirjava_Isabelle: on 04/25/2007
Witch_Queen: on 04/30/2007
Lyra at heart age 13: on 05/01/2007
Witch_Queen: on 05/01/2007
Mary_Malone: on 05/01/2007
This production design still is gorgeous -- it faithfully reimagines a believable alternate-London, and with a little more air and glass mixed into the architecture (fitting for a civilization obsessed with churches, magic, and delicate machines like zeppelins). And for those screaming about "why all the churches, I don't remember Catholics in HDM" (LOL) -- did you even read the books? The Church/Magistereum tightly controls pretty much everything in Lyra's world (it's one of the main reasons for Asriel to do what he does).
Sorry to rant. But I just wish people would chill out on the whole "Lyra looks wrong! Her face looks wrong in this picture! I hate pink tights! Mrs. Coulter has black hair! Asriel doesn't have a beard! Lee isn't old!" wah wah wah etc. The filmmakers are working very closely to get Philip Pullman's seal of approval on everything, from casting to set and production design, etc.
Personally, Sam Eliott wasn't what I pictured for Lee -- but now I love him in the role. Meanwhile, I always pictured Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig in their roles so I am unbelievably thrilled such talented actors will play those parts. I even love Mrs. Coulter blonde -- I realized she had black hair in the books, but kept stubbornly picturing her having golden hair, sort of mirroring her daemon. And Kidman looks gorgeous and very cold -- just like Coulter should.
Maybe everything won't look like what you personally pictured. That doesn't mean the movies are already doomed to failure. Do you know how lucky we are that this movie is being made so faithfully, and by people who love the books so passionately? Did anyone *see* how bad, for instance, "Eragon" turned out? Believe me, it could be worse!
Gabzie: on 05/01/2007
Pan_Kirjava_Isabelle: on 05/03/2007
Witch_Queen: on 05/03/2007
Maria: on 05/05/2007
Diarmaid: on 05/06/2007
JadelynRiddle: on 05/18/2007
take a read on some of the architectural history of wren's concepts- his redesign of london after the 1666 fire...it makes sense to use his style as a possible map for a redesign of london for a world evolved seperately from ours.
Ama: on 05/28/2007
Lyra&Pan: on 06/07/2007
Fallen Authority: on 06/20/2007
Mary C.: on 07/01/2007
jonny: on 07/02/2007
Nessa: on 07/03/2007
Lyra at heart age 13: on 08/12/2007
Ama: on 08/14/2007
Grissha: on 08/14/2007
Ama: on 08/14/2007
Witch_Queen: on 08/20/2007
The church is hidding alot I think and one day its all going to come out.
Lyra at heart age 13: on 08/25/2007
Royal Horticultural Society: on 09/10/2007
Ama: on 09/25/2007
trespass: on 10/08/2007
I dunno, the designs of the whole movie look a bit ALL TOO MUCH (and too SHINY) to accompany a story which I figured opaque, dark and discrete props/buildings/costumes/skies/etc would suit it better... Not that I imagine that anyone would care for my opinion... But I think the fact is that the big overdeveloped stuff are only done in order to make the movie more appealing to the pedestrian fantasy film audience (which consists of the larger part of the paying public, and therefore, the ones the producers want to come to watch the movie on its opening weekend), and appearently, big sets/special effects/stars/etc is the only way, concerning a "family entertainment movie", "to get the jaded, video-sated public off their ******* arses and back in the ******* cinema" to quote the ever-wise Pythons.
What I'm trying to say is that I think ranting over the details of "Coulter had black hair"/"this is not how *I* pictured it" is useless....the problem is that we are talking about a fairly non-commercial children's book(s) (in the sense that there aren't many ones I read in those days which dealt with philosophy/psychology/religion/sex/physics/human psych?ɬ©/the primordial questions of life, the universe and everything else * ;) * in such depth and seriousness) being turned into a very commercial movie, which is more than likely to tell its story in a very commercial manner (that is, not only shoving all those interesting elements under the proverbial "subplot rug" in favor of your typical "children out on a big fantasy adventure" plot **and I SINCERELLY HOPE THEY WON'T**, but also filling the screen with big sets/special effects/etc which don't seem to fit the nature of such a story: remember, the magic is in not only in what you tell but also in HOW you tell it).
Of course, it was inevitable that a big hollywood studio would want to do a movie out of it since, commercially, IT WAS pretty succesful! Ok, you can argue that even if the movie turns out to be a complete rip off, the book is still there, and so is its "message" (hate the word); however, the more people such a movie reaches (and believe me, it will reach A LOT OF PEOPLE), the more diluted the "message" would get: more people would (well, people would *start to* anyway) think the book is just "kids rubbish", more people would buy the book believing to be "kids rubbish" and would be put off by finding out that IT ISN'T, more people would be fans "just because" (buying t-shirts/toys/costumes/Special Collector's Edition DVD's/going to conventions/etc) and let the "true essence" of the story slip away, plus other sad consequences.
So... what elements of this movie are there just for the sake of "profiting yet another miserable buck", and what is there that is truthful to the spirit of the story? Well, guess we'll have to wait and see...
Boy, do I write a lot when I get excited!...sorry to the ones who read the whole thing through and disagreed (A note: I certainly didn't mean that ALL of the fans who "buy stuff" let the "essence" of the story slip away; hope I didn't get misunderstood... and won't get flamed).
By the way, this is a FANTASTIC site (it has always been, it goes way back!). I have been checking news in here for a long time now, though this is the first time I post anything in it. I would just like to say thank you to everyone involved in it. (AND I'M NOT JUST SAYING IT BY MEANS OF KISSING-ARSES, MIND YOU).
There, finished.......you can flame me now...
Ama: on 10/09/2007
Witch_Queen: on 10/11/2007
no name: on 03/17/2009