The Republic of Heaven

Spectres in Cittigazze

Discuss the second book of the trilogy

Postby Enitharmon » Sun Jan 23, 2005 12:49 am

krebbe wrote:neutrinos (tiny particles with negligible or no mass that hardly interact with anything and travel at the speed of light - lots are passing straight through us and the earth all the time).


As more of a literary lass, may I put a literary slant on this? :P

John Updike wrote:Neutrinos, they are very small.
They have no charge and have no mass
And do not interact at all.
The earth is just a silly ball
To them, through which they simply pass,
Like dustmaids down a drafty hall
Or photons through a sheet of glass.
They snub the most exquisite gas,
Ignore the most substantial wall,
Cold shoulder steel and sounding brass,
Insult the stallion in his stall,
And scorning barriers of class,
Infiltrate you and me! Like tall
and painless guillotines, they fall
Down through our heads into the grass.
At night, they enter at Nepal
and pierce the lover and his lass
From underneath the bed-you call
It wonderful; I call it crass.
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of eighteen (Albert Einstein)
The Book of Enitharmon
Currently reading: Vanity Fair by William M Thackeray
Enitharmon
Ageing Drama Queen
 
Posts: 6220
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 1:13 pm
Yahoo Messenger: swanofkennet
AOL: SwanOfKennet
Location: New Liverpool, town of pie, peas and gravy

Postby krebbe » Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:10 am

Enitharmon wrote:As more of a literary lass, may I put a literary slant on this? :P

John Updike wrote:Neutrinos, they are very small.
They have no charge and have no mass
And do not interact at all.
The earth is just a silly ball
To them, through which they simply pass,
Like dustmaids down a drafty hall
Or photons through a sheet of glass.
They snub the most exquisite gas,
Ignore the most substantial wall,
Cold shoulder steel and sounding brass,
Insult the stallion in his stall,
And scorning barriers of class,
Infiltrate you and me! Like tall
and painless guillotines, they fall
Down through our heads into the grass.
At night, they enter at Nepal
and pierce the lover and his lass
From underneath the bed-you call
It wonderful; I call it crass.

A great poem. It was in my A-level physics textbook too! :P

It doesn't mention that they come in 3 different flavours though!

Max wrote:You go in for that dark matter codswallop then do you? It's not as bad as 'dark energy', but the whole thing makes me snigger. '~*pineapples*~, our theories don't match our observations... I know, let's invent a load of completely undetectable stuff to account for the discrepancy! It's the perfect cri-.. Explanation!' In short, I'm not convinced.

It does sound uncannily like a 'fudge factor'. It's all we've got until someone comes up with a better idea or finds the stuff.

Edit: it appears max didn't write that anymore :)
Edit 2: what's going on I'm confused?!
Edit 3: Is Max schizophrenic?- why is he rebuking and referring to himself in the 3rd person?!
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Join BttS Chat on [url=irc://irc.quakenet.org/btts]irc.quakenet.org #btts[/url]
chat forum topic
chat channel statistics
User avatar
krebbe
Stultifyingly Substantiated
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:58 pm

Postby Max » Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:23 am

Umm.. I wrote:It's perfectly respectable scientific method. It's also how discoveries have been made. Consider the discoveries of the planets Neptune and Pluto, and the other one the name of which escapes me for the moment. You have a discrepancy in your measurements? Construct a theoretical hypothesis to account for the discrepancy, and then go out and look for evidence that the hypothesis is true.

And look how Pluto's ended up. My point wasn't about the making of hypotheses to account for discrepancies, but the way in which this particular one isn't one for which confirmatory evidence can, by virtue of the theory itself, be found - and that in this instance what was required was a theoretical review as opposed to the hypothesis of a new variable. And so it turns out - it now appears that the discrepancy is explicable by flaws in theory as opposed to all this dark nonsense.

Above all it's about that this hypothesis is generally portrayed as verified theory.

I also wrote:And Max, dear, please mind your language and be less aggressive in your disagreements. You've been told before...

Eh? I can see how that might apply to previous posts, but not that one.
Last edited by Max on Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:27 am, edited 4 times in total.
Image
Max
Guardian of the Thesauri
 
Posts: 3796
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Postby Enitharmon » Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:24 am

krebbe wrote:Edit: it appears max didn't write that anymore :)
Edit 2: what's going on I'm confused?!
Edit 3: Is Max schizophrenic?- why is he rebuking and referring to himself in the 3rd person?!


Some call it 'Rosie doing a whoopsie'.

My apologies :oops:

krebbe wrote:It does sound uncannily like a 'fudge factor'. It's all we've got until someone comes up with a better idea or finds the stuff.


What we used to call 'Martin's Constant' in my early days in computing (COBOL-bashing on a battered old NCR Century 100). After a colleague who often made use of them. An arbitrary constant introduced into a calculation, not because anybody knows why it works but because it produces the result the management want to see.
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of eighteen (Albert Einstein)
The Book of Enitharmon
Currently reading: Vanity Fair by William M Thackeray
Enitharmon
Ageing Drama Queen
 
Posts: 6220
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 1:13 pm
Yahoo Messenger: swanofkennet
AOL: SwanOfKennet
Location: New Liverpool, town of pie, peas and gravy

Postby krebbe » Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:08 am

Max wrote:My point wasn't about the making of hypotheses to account for discrepancies, but the way in which this particular one isn't one for which confirmatory evidence can, by virtue of the theory itself, be found - and that in this instance what was required was a theoretical review as opposed to the hypothesis of a new variable. And so it turns out - it now appears that the discrepancy is explicable by flaws in theory as opposed to all this dark nonsense.

Above all it's about that this hypothesis is generally portrayed as verified theory.

I wasn't aware the discrepancy had an alternative explanation that nullified dark matter? Of course every time there's a difference between observation and prediction, the current theories have to either be wrong or incomplete.

I was still under the impression that dark matter was widely accepted as a working hypothesis. I'll ask the physicists later.

As for its wide acceptance as fact, I think the media is to blame: they like to draw pretty diagrams and sensationalise it all. That Pullman bloke is the worst for doing it - sentient fundamental particles indeed! :sarcasm:

Enitharmon wrote:What we used to call 'Martin's Constant' in my early days in computing (COBOL-bashing on a battered old NCR Century 100). After a colleague who often made use of them. An arbitrary constant introduced into a calculation, not because anybody knows why it works but because it produces the result the management want to see.

There's plenty of them in theories derived from classical assumptions. Quantum mechanics really tidies things up :)
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Join BttS Chat on [url=irc://irc.quakenet.org/btts]irc.quakenet.org #btts[/url]
chat forum topic
chat channel statistics
User avatar
krebbe
Stultifyingly Substantiated
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:58 pm

Postby Huginn » Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:11 am

And if we used Planck units, we could get rid of those unnecessary conversion factors due to our imperfect system of units.
It just is.
Huginn
Idiocy Reincarnate
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:33 pm
AOL: huginn372
Location: Somewhere, but not here

Postby krebbe » Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:24 am

They're not particularly practical for everyday use :P
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Join BttS Chat on [url=irc://irc.quakenet.org/btts]irc.quakenet.org #btts[/url]
chat forum topic
chat channel statistics
User avatar
krebbe
Stultifyingly Substantiated
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:58 pm

Postby Starshade » Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:21 pm

Numbers too big to comprehend properly.
Currently Listening: The Last Of Us (Goodnight) - Gustavo Santaolalla
Currently Watching: Spotify
Currently Playing: Teslagrad/Hearthstone

and the time is 12.38 BST.
User avatar
Starshade
Heartbroken Muse
 
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: Home - Exmouth UK

Postby Huginn » Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:39 am

This is why we have prefixes like giga- and tera- and so on.
It just is.
Huginn
Idiocy Reincarnate
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:33 pm
AOL: huginn372
Location: Somewhere, but not here

Postby krebbe » Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:15 am

The national (duel-carriageway) speed limit would be 1.03x10^-7 Planck length units/Planck time unit - would be a fun sign post :P
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Join BttS Chat on [url=irc://irc.quakenet.org/btts]irc.quakenet.org #btts[/url]
chat forum topic
chat channel statistics
User avatar
krebbe
Stultifyingly Substantiated
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:58 pm

Postby Melancholy Man » Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:06 pm

Edit 3: Is Max schizophrenic?- why is he rebuking and referring to himself in the 3rd person?


I've called Max a lot of things, but that ain't schizophrenia!
==========================================

That accent o' yers, are ye frae Holland like me?

Visit an almost daily photo-diary of the Hyperborean North.

View the Hyperborean North from a Rabbit's Eye View

CURRENTLY READING ==> The Economist
User avatar
Melancholy Man
Yoruba Warlock
 
Posts: 5589
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: Lon.: -3.52. Lat. : 58.59

Postby Peter » Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:42 pm

krebbe wrote:The national (duel-carriageway) speed limit would be 1.03x10^-7 Planck length units/Planck time unit - would be a fun sign post :P


Is this a subtle filmic reference?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067023/
User avatar
Peter
Not an endangered species
 
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 11:36 am
Website: http://www.cereswunderkind.net
Location: Oakingham

Postby krebbe » Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:50 pm

Bah, my writing brain is thinking phonetically again :(
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Join BttS Chat on [url=irc://irc.quakenet.org/btts]irc.quakenet.org #btts[/url]
chat forum topic
chat channel statistics
User avatar
krebbe
Stultifyingly Substantiated
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:58 pm

Postby Peter » Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:04 pm

I had a mental picture of cars jousting...
User avatar
Peter
Not an endangered species
 
Posts: 5212
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 11:36 am
Website: http://www.cereswunderkind.net
Location: Oakingham

Postby Dante » Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:00 pm

krebbe wrote:Edit 3: Is Max schizophrenic?- why is he rebuking and referring to himself in the 3rd person?!


*Grumbles*
Seems to be a craze around here...
Dante
Kombucha Mushroom Person
 
Posts: 3705
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountains


Return to “%s” The Subtle Knife

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Content © 2001-2011 BridgeToTheStars.Net.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.
cron