Would it be posible (in theory) to create the subtle knife?
46 posts
• Page 3 of 3
Back to the wedging thing; don't forget that the "gaps" between particles are ~*iguana*~ massive. A fullstop (nucleus) in a sportshall (atom) is the usual example. So I don't think much wedging could really work.
Q: If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God tell you when you arrive at the Pearly Gates?
Pullman: Well, I'm retiring, would you like to take it on ?
Pullman: Well, I'm retiring, would you like to take it on ?
- Will
- Homo Sine Deo
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 12:29 pm
- Location: Eastern Anglia
Yeah, so I was assuming he meant particles as in electrons, nucleons/quarks, or the various other such particles rather than atoms, which are, relatively speaking, very easy to break apart (with radiation).Back to the wedging thing; don't forget that the "gaps" between particles are ~*iguana*~ massive. A fullstop (nucleus) in a sportshall (atom) is the usual example. So I don't think much wedging could really work.
- Max
- Guardian of the Thesauri
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 2:57 pm
- Location: Cambridge, UK
Surly it would be very dangerous to create a single blade like this, if it were waved about or even moved through the air would it not cause explosions? And isn't the radiation required for what Max said very dangerous to humans?
-
muddmania - Grazer
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:36 pm
- Website: http://www.freewebs.com/spandex5
- Location: Flintshire, UK The land of the 900 handbag cars with loud exhausts and aloys
Not if it just 'cut'. If it actually destroyed matter, relatively large amounts of energy would be released, but I doubt dangerous amounts.Surly it would be very dangerous to create a single blade like this, if it were waved about or even moved through the air would it not cause explosions?
In high doses, yeah. But it's not really relevant, because that kind of thing is part of nature and nothing to do with what the knife does.And isn't the radiation required for what Max said very dangerous to humans?
- Max
- Guardian of the Thesauri
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 2:57 pm
- Location: Cambridge, UK
If you say that then wouldn't that mean that if you could travel fast enough you could effectivly travel back in time. So if that therory is true, then time travel is possible. And also you can't travel forward in time... You would have to go slower than the speed of light... we are going that fast now... even as I type, the faster you go the slower time is... you cannot slow down the speed we are now because that would defy the laws of physics.trveling faster slows down time. In the evedence shown, time travel could be posible (onley forward) at very high speeds.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening!
- Burning_Ape
- Grazer
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 1:14 pm
- Website: http://www.burning-ape.net
- Yahoo Messenger: freeyourmind202003@yahoo.co.uk
- Location: England
46 posts
• Page 3 of 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Content © 2001-2011 BridgeToTheStars.Net.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.
Images from The Golden Compass movie are © New Line Cinema.